Opinion
Case No. 11-2292 EMC
10-17-2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARC X. PEARL, Defendant.
MICHAEL COSENTINO SBN 83253 Attorney at Law Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America
MICHAEL COSENTINO SBN 83253
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Plaintiff
United States of America
REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE CMC HEARING
WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL ATTACHED
Case Management Conference:
REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE CMC HEARING
Plaintiff's counsel requests that the CMC set for November 4, 2011, be continued to November 11, 2011, or November 18, 2011, or beyond, because plaintiff's counsel has a conflict with the recently set November 4, 2011, CMC date.
Had plaintiff's counsel been notified by defendant of his request to continue the CMC that was set for October 28, 2011, plaintiff's counsel would have stated that he was unavailable for November 4, 2011.
Plaintiff's counsel would have telephoned defendant regarding the herein request but for the fact that defendant did not provide his telephone number to counsel or to the court.
Michael Cosentino
Counsel for Plaintiff
The case management conference is continued to December 2, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.
Judge Edward M. Chen
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of Alameda, I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to the within above-entitled action; my business address is P.O. Box 129, Alameda CA, 94501. On October 17, 2011, I served the attached REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE CMC HEARING on the parties in said action, by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully pre-paid, in the United States Post Office Box in Oakland, California, addressed as follows:
Marc X. Pearl
601 4th Street, Ste. #220
San Francisco, CA 94107
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on October 17, 2011, in Alameda, California.
Michael Cosentino