From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pazmino

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 27, 2022
20 Cr. 645 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2022)

Opinion

20 Cr. 645 (PAE)

07-27-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCO PAZMINO, Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Thomas A. McKay, Paul M. Monteleoni, Aline R. Flodr Assistant United States Attorneys MARCO PAZMINO Mame Lenox, Esq. Attorney for Defendant


DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York

Thomas A. McKay, Paul M. Monteleoni, Aline R. Flodr Assistant United States Attorneys

MARCO PAZMINO Mame Lenox, Esq. Attorney for Defendant

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE PAUL A ENGELMAYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about December 1, 2020, MARCO PAZMINO (the “Defendant”) was charged in a two-count Information, 20 Cr. 645 (PAE) (the “Information”), with conspiracy, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 (Count One); and federal program fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 666(a)(1)(A) and 2 (Count Two);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One and Two of the Information, seeking, forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461, of all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information;

WHEREAS, on or about December 1, 2020 the Defendant pled guilty to Counts One and Two of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Counts One and Two of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28 United States Code, Section 2461(c), a sum of money representing proceeds earned from the crimes charged in Counts One and Two of the Information; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $17,126.73 in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas McKay, Paul M. Monteleoni, and Aline R. Flodr, of counsel, and the Defendant, MARCO PAZMINO, and his counsel, Mame Lenox, Esq., that:

1. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $17,126.73 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, MARCO PAZMINO, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

7. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

AGREED AND CONSENTED TO:

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Pazmino

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 27, 2022
20 Cr. 645 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Pazmino

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCO PAZMINO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 27, 2022

Citations

20 Cr. 645 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2022)