Opinion
CRIMINAL NO. 12-cr-20043
10-17-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-1 ARTHUR PAYTON, Defendant.
HON. LAWRENCE ZATKOFF
OPINION AND ORDER
Defendant is currently represented by Sanford Plotkin, his third attorney in this case. One of Defendant's prior attorneys filed two motions on his behalf: (1) Motion for Notice of Intent to Use FRE 404B Evidence (Docket #33), and (2) Motion for Early Disclosure of Exculpatory and Impeaching Evidence and Other Relevant Material (Docket #34). Both motions were fully briefed.
The Court recently queried Mr. Plotkin about the need to address the motions. Mr. Plotkin represented to the Court that the issues raised in both motions are now moot. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES AS MOOT the following two motions previously filed on behalf of Defendant:
(1) Motion for Notice of Intent to Use FRE 404B Evidence (Docket #33), and
(2) Motion for Early Disclosure of Exculpatory and Impeaching Evidence and Other Relevant Material (Docket #34).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________
LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE