From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Paunescu

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 2022
13 Cr. 41 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2022)

Opinion

13 Cr. 41 (LGS)

07-28-2022

United States of America v. Mihai Ionut Paunescu, Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney Sarah Lai Assistant United States Attorney Ian Marcus Amelkin, Esq. Counsel for Mihai Ionut Paunescu


DAMIAN WILLIAMS

United States Attorney

Sarah Lai

Assistant United States Attorney

Ian Marcus Amelkin, Esq.

Counsel for Mihai Ionut Paunescu

PROTECTIVE ORDER

HONORABLE LORNA G. SCHOFIELD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Upon the application of the United States of America, with the consent of the undersigned counsel, and the defendant having requested discovery under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a), the Court hereby finds and orders as follows:

1. Disclosure Material. The Government will make disclosure to the defendant of documents, objects and information, including electronically stored information (“ESI”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, and the Government's general obligation to produce exculpatory and impeachment material in criminal cases, all of which will be referred to herein as “Disclosure Material.”

2. Sensitive Disclosure Material. The Government's Disclosure Material may include Sensitive Disclosure Material that (i) affects the privacy, confidentiality and business interests of individuals and entities; (ii) would impede, if prematurely disclosed, the Government's ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals; (iii) would risk prejudicial pretrial publicity if publicly disseminated; and (iv) that is not authorized to be disclosed to the public or disclosed beyond that which is necessary for the defense of this criminal case. The Government's designation of material as Sensitive Disclosure Material will be controlling absent contrary order of the Court.

NOW, THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Sensitive Disclosure Material shall not be disclosed by the defendant or defense counsel, including any successor counsel (“the defense”) other than as set forth herein, and shall be used by the defense solely for purposes of defending this action. The defense shall not post any Disclosure Material on any Internet site or network site to which persons other than the parties hereto have access, and shall not disclose any Disclosure Material to the media or any third party except as set forth below.

2. Sensitive Disclosure Material may be disclosed by counsel to the following persons (hereafter, “Designated Persons”):

(a) The defendant;

(b) Personnel for whose conduct counsel is responsible, i.e., personnel employed by or retained by counsel, as needed for purposes of defending this action;

(c) Prospective witnesses for purposes of defending this action; and

(d) Such other others as hereafter may be authorized by the Court.

All Designated Persons to whom Sensitive Disclosure Material is disclosed in accordance with this provision shall be subject to the terms of this Order. To the extent Sensitive Disclosure Material is disclosed to any Designated Persons, defense counsel shall first provide each Designated Person with a copy of this Order and instruct such Designated Persons that they are bound by the terms of this Order. Defense counsel shall maintain a record of what information has been disclosed to such persons.

3. The Government may designate Disclosure Material as Sensitive Disclosure Material by labeling such Disclosure Material as “Sensitive Disclosure Material” or “Subject to Protective Order.” In the event of any dispute as to the Government's designation of particular Disclosure Material as Sensitive Disclosure Material, the parties shall meet and confer, without prejudice to a subsequent application by defense counsel seeking de-designation of such material by the Court.

4. The Government may authorize, in writing, disclosure of Sensitive Disclosure Material beyond that otherwise permitted by this Order without further Order of this Court.

5. This Order does not prevent the disclosure of any Sensitive Disclosure Material in any hearing or trial held in this action, or to any judge or magistrate judge, for purposes of this action. However, Sensitive Disclosure Material pertinent to any motion before the Court should initially be filed under seal, absent consent of the Government or Order of the Court. All filings should comply with the privacy protection provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1.

6. Except for Disclosure Material that has been made part of the record of this case, the defense shall return to the Government or securely destroy or delete all Disclosure Material, including the seized ESI Disclosure Material, within 30 days of the expiration of the period for direct appeal from any verdict in the above-captioned case; the period of direct appeal from any order dismissing any of the charges in the above-captioned case; or the granting of any motion made on behalf of the Government dismissing any charges in the above-captioned case, whichever date is later, subject to defense counsel's obligation to retain client files under the Rules of Professional Conduct. If Disclosure Material is provided to any prospective witnesses, counsel shall make reasonable efforts to seek the return or destruction of such materials.

7. The defense shall provide a copy of this Order to prospective witnesses and persons retained by counsel to whom the defense has disclosed disclosure material or the Government's ESI production. All such persons shall be subject to the terms of this Order. Defense counsel shall maintain a record of what information has been disclosed to which such persons.

8. This Order places no restriction on a defendant's use or disclosure of ESI that originally belonged to the defendant. This provision does not apply to any data or information in the defendant's possession (including ESI stored on the defendant's electronic devices) that was obtained from victims and customers, with or without their consent.

Retention of Jurisdiction

10. The provisions of this order shall not terminate at the conclusion of this criminal prosecution and the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order following termination of the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Paunescu

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 2022
13 Cr. 41 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Paunescu

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Mihai Ionut Paunescu, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 28, 2022

Citations

13 Cr. 41 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2022)