From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Patino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 6, 2011
CR No. 11-MJ-70677-MAG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

CR No. 11-MJ-70677-MAG

10-06-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CRISTINA DELORES PATINO, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division TAREK HELOU (CABN 218225) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)

United States Attorney

MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)

Chief, Criminal Division

TAREK HELOU (CABN 218225)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the United States of America

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER FED. R. CRIM. P. 5.1 & 18 U.S.C. § 3161 AND CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

CURRENT DATE: October 7, 2011

CURRENT TIME: 9:30 a.m.

PROPOSED DATE: October 20, 2011

PROPOSED TIME: 9:30 a.m.

On June 16, 2011, the defendant was arrested based on a warrant issued upon a Criminal Complaint pending in the Eastern District of Virginia. That case is pending in the Eastern District of Virginia, case number 11-MJ-455. The defendant is out of custody.

The parties anticipate that they will consent to the disposition of the case in the Northern District of California, where the defendant was arrested and is on bond and pretrial supervision. The parties also anticipate that the defendant will consent to proceed by information instead of indictment and waive trial in the Northern District of California. The parties are diligently preparing the necessary paperwork, which has taken some time.

Therefore, the parties stipulate and jointly request that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure ("FRCP") 5.1(d), the time limits set forth in FRCP 5.1(c) be excluded from October 7, 2011 through October 20, 2011. The parties agree that, taking into account the public interest in prompt disposition of criminal cases, good cause exists for this extension. The parties also request that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act from October 7, 2011 through October 20, 2011 because the defendant needs additional time to review discovery and to conduct necessary investigation. The parties also request that the Court continue the status conference scheduled for October 7, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. to October 20, 2011 at 9:30 a.m STIPULATED:

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

TAREK HELOU

Assistant United States Attorney

ELLEN LEONIDA

Attorney for Defendant Cristina Delores Patino

For the reasons stated above, the Court finds that exclusion of time from October 7, 2011 through October 20, 2011 is warranted and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A); FRCP 5.1(d). The failure to grant the requested continuance would deny the defendant effective preparation of counsel, and would result in a miscarriage ofjustice. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). SO ORDERED.

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Patino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 6, 2011
CR No. 11-MJ-70677-MAG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Patino

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CRISTINA DELORES PATINO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

CR No. 11-MJ-70677-MAG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)