From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pascual

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 7, 2013
08 CR 705 (S-1)(RJD) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 2013)

Opinion

08 CR 705 (S-1)(RJD)

08-07-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MINERVA PASCUAL, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM & ORDER

DEARIE, District Judge

Defendant Minerva Pascual invokes Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to seek clarification of my November 3, 2010 decision denying her motion to suppress. I am comfortable with my ruling and decline to revisit it, particularly in light of the Second Circuit's holding in United States v. Pascual, 502 F. App'x 75, 76-79 (2d Cir. 2012). And, in any event, the clarification that Ms. Pascual seeks does not involve the type of "clerical error" that can be remedied by Rule 36. See United States v. Burd, 86 F.3d 285, 288 (2d Cir. 1996); United States v. Werber, 51 F.3d 342, 346-48 (2d Cir. 1995). SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York

August 7, 2013

________

RAYMOND J. DEARIE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Pascual

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 7, 2013
08 CR 705 (S-1)(RJD) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Pascual

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MINERVA PASCUAL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 7, 2013

Citations

08 CR 705 (S-1)(RJD) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 2013)