From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Partida

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 25, 2014
CR-12-00834-EMC(NC) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2014)

Opinion

          STEVEN F. GRUEL Attorney at Law, San Francisco, California, Attorney for Juan Partida.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS HEARING TO OCTOBER 1, 2014

          EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

         Defendant Juan Partida, by and through his attorney, Steven F. Gruel, hereby requests that the hearing scheduled for August 27, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. be continued until October 1, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. The good cause for this defense request is that in accordance with the Court's Order, advisory counsel (Richard Tamor) has been appointed in this case. Mr. Tamor is discussing the case with defense counsel and Mr. Partida. Additional time is needed for Mr. Tamor to work with Mr. Partida.

         Pending motions, as well as continuity of counsel and the need for effective preparation for defense counsel, all provide a basis for exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act.

         The government does not oppose and stipulates to this defense request.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         PREDICATED on the above stipulation and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the August 27, 2014 status hearing is continued to October 1, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. Excludable time in accordance with the Speedy Trial Act continues as stipulated above.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Partida

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 25, 2014
CR-12-00834-EMC(NC) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Partida

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN PARTIDA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 25, 2014

Citations

CR-12-00834-EMC(NC) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2014)