From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Paredes

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 31, 2016
651 F. App'x 581 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-10390

05-31-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NOE MARTINEZ PAREDES, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 1:14-cr-00779-LEK MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding Before: REINHARDT, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Noe Martinez Paredes appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Martinez Paredes's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Martinez Paredes the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Paredes

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 31, 2016
651 F. App'x 581 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Paredes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NOE MARTINEZ PAREDES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 31, 2016

Citations

651 F. App'x 581 (9th Cir. 2016)