From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 2, 1940
1 F.R.D. 100 (S.D.N.Y. 1940)

Opinion

         Proceeding by the United States of America against Paramount Pictures, Inc., and others. On motion to vacate notice of examination.

         Motion denied.

          John T. Cahill, of New York City, Thurman Arnold, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paul Williams, Robert L. Wright, John F. Clagett, J. Stephen Doyle, and Thomas Lynch, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Seymour Krieger, Sp. Atty., of Washington, D. C., J. Frank Cunningham, Sp. Atty., Seymour Simon, Sp.

Atty., and William P. Farnsworth, Sp. Atty., of New York City, for the United States.

          Schwartz & Frohlich, of New York City, for defendant Columbia Pictures Corporation.


          BONDY, District Judge.

         The motion to vacate the notice of examination is denied. It is directed that the examination of Harry Cohn take place in Los Angeles, California, unless he is in or comes to New York, in which event the deposition may be taken in New York.

         An affidavit has just been submitted to the court indicating that Mr. Cohn is now in New York. If this is so, he must submit to the examination in New York as stated in the notice of examination.


Summaries of

United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 2, 1940
1 F.R.D. 100 (S.D.N.Y. 1940)
Case details for

United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 2, 1940

Citations

1 F.R.D. 100 (S.D.N.Y. 1940)

Citing Cases

United States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.

Defendants, however, have ample opportunity, under other provisions of the rules, to procure information as…