From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Palencar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 19, 2014
3:14-CV-733 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2014)

Opinion

3:14-CV-733

12-19-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT PALENCAR, d/b/a Uptown Limousine Services, Defendant.


DECISION & ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This action was referred to the Hon. David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Peebles's Report and Recommendation [dkt. # 7] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

II. DISCUSSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [dkt. # 7] for the reasons stated therein. Based on Plaintiff's failure to arrange for service of process on Defendant, and in consideration of the factors relevant to dismissal under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 19, 2014

/s/_________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Palencar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 19, 2014
3:14-CV-733 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Palencar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT PALENCAR, d/b/a Uptown…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 19, 2014

Citations

3:14-CV-733 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2014)