From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Palamara

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 22, 2024
No. 24-1017 (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2024)

Opinion

MAG. 24-1017

02-22-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADAM PALAMARA


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TET/ECONFERENCING

Honorable Elizabeth A. Pascal United States Magistrate Judge

In accordance with the operative CO VID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds: [√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video i i teleconferencing capability.

[] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Palamara

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 22, 2024
No. 24-1017 (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Palamara

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADAM PALAMARA

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Feb 22, 2024

Citations

No. 24-1017 (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2024)