From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Palacios

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 19, 2006
163 F. App'x 615 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Page 616.

U.S. Attorney, USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jeanne G. Knight, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-03344-LAB.

Before: HUG, O'SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Isaac Richard Palacios appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bringing undocumented aliens into the United States for commercial advantage in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand to the sentencing court for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Palacios

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 19, 2006
163 F. App'x 615 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Palacios

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Isaac Richard PALACIOS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 19, 2006

Citations

163 F. App'x 615 (9th Cir. 2006)