From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Padilla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 9, 2011
Case No. 11-101 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-101 WBS

09-09-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DIONISIO ROBLES PADILLA, Defendant.

DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender M.Petrik MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney M.Petrik for Jill M. Thomas JILL M. THOMAS Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., #177913

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Defendant

DIONISIO ROBLES PADILLA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE TO SEPTEMBER 26, 2011, AT 8:30 A.M.

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through counsel, Jill M. Thomas, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael Petrik, Jr., attorney for Mr. Padilla, that the Court vacate the status conference scheduled for September 12, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., and reset it for September 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.

Defense counsel requires the continuance to review discovery and confer with Mr. Padilla.

The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through September 26, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. Padilla's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. Padilla in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

M.Petrik

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Defendant

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

M.Petrik for Jill M. Thomas

JILL M. THOMAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on September 26, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4). The Court also finds that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. Padilla's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. Padilla in a speedy trial.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Padilla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 9, 2011
Case No. 11-101 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Padilla

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DIONISIO ROBLES PADILLA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 9, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-101 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2011)