Opinion
Case No. 2:11-cr-00253 KJM
08-24-2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TAMMY PACHECO, Defendant.
LINDA C. HARTER Chief Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant TAMMY PACHECO JARED DOLAN Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424
Federal Defender LINDA C. HARTER, Bar #179741
Chief Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
TAMMY PACHECO
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING
STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME
DATE: August 25, 2011
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
JUDGE: Kimberly J. Mueller
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JARED DOLAN, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and LINDA C. HARTER, Chief Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for Defendant, that the Status Conference hearing date of August 25, 2011 be vacated, and the matter rescheduled for Status Conference on October 20, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.
This continuance is requested because Ms. Pacheco's counsel needs additional time to prepare, conduct additional factual investigation, and continue preliminary discussion with government's counsel toward possible resolution of the case.
To afford time to complete these tasks, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including October 20, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.
Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL J. BRODERICK
Federal Defender
LINDA C. HARTER
Chief Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
TAMMY PACHECO
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
JARED DOLAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Status Conference set for August 25, 2011 is vacated and rescheduled for October 20, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. For the reasons set forth above, the court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through October 20, 2011.
_____________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE