Opinion
CR 16-65-GF-BMM-JTJ
07-02-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DENNY OWENS, JR., Defendant.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
I. Synopsis
Defendant Denny Owens, Jr. (Owens) has been accused of violating the conditions of his supervised release. Owens admitted all of the alleged violations. Owens's supervised release should be revoked. Owens should be placed in custody for 9 months, with no supervised release to follow.
II. Status
Owens pleaded guilty to Domestic Abuse by an Habitual Offender on December 13, 2016. (Doc. 24). The Court sentenced Owens to 29 months of custody, followed by 2 years of supervised release. (Doc. 41). Owens's current term of supervised release began on May 24, 2019. (Doc. 54).
Petition
The United States Probation Office filed a Petition on June 20, 2019, requesting that the Court revoke Owens's supervised release. (Doc. 54). The Petition alleged that Owens had violated the conditions of his supervised release: 1) by using a controlled substance; 2) by failing to complete his substance abuse treatment program; and 3) by failing to complete his 90-day term at Connections West Inpatient Treatment Facility.
Initial appearance
Owens appeared before the undersigned for his initial appearance on July 1, 2019. Owens was represented by counsel. Owens stated that he had read the petition and that he understood the allegations. Owens waived his right to a preliminary hearing. The parties consented to proceed with the revocation hearing before the undersigned.
Revocation hearing
The Court conducted a revocation hearing on July 1, 2019. Owens admitted that he had violated the conditions of his supervised release: 1) by using a controlled substance; 2) by failing to complete his substance abuse treatment program; and 3) by failing to complete his 90-day term at Connections West Inpatient Treatment Facility. The violations are serious and warrant revocation of Owens's supervised release.
Owens's violations are Grade C violations. Owens's criminal history category is I. Owens's underlying offense is a Class D felony. Owens could be incarcerated for up to 24 months. He could be ordered to remain on supervised release for up to 33 months, less any custody time imposed. The United States Sentencing Guidelines call for a term of custody of 3 to 9 months.
III. Analysis
Owens's supervised release should be revoked. Owens should be incarcerated for 9 months, with no supervised release to follow. This sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary.
IV. Conclusion
The Court informed Owens that the above sentence would be recommended to Judge Morris. The Court also informed Owens of his right to object to these Findings and Recommendations within 14 days of their issuance. The Court explained to Owens that Judge Morris would consider a timely objection before making a final determination on whether to revoke his supervised release and what, if any, sanction to impose. Owens stated that he wished to waive his right to object to these Findings and Recommendations, and that he wished to waive his right to allocute before Judge Morris. The Court FINDS:
That Denny Owens, Jr. violated the conditions of his supervised release by using a controlled substance, by failing to complete his substance abuse treatment program, and by failing to complete his 90-day term at Connections West Inpatient Treatment Facility.The Court RECOMMENDS:
That the District Court revoke Owens's supervised release and commit him to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons for a term of 9 months, with no supervised release to follow.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT TO FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO
OBJECT
The parties may serve and file written objections to the Findings and Recommendations within 14 days of their entry, as indicated on the Notice of Electronic Filing. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A United States district court judge will make a de novo determination regarding any portion of the Findings and Recommendations to which objection is made. The district court judge may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the Findings and Recommendations. Failure to timely file written objections may bar a de novo determination by the district court judge, and may waive the right to appear and allocute before a district court judge.
DATED this 2nd day of July, 2019.
/s/_________
John Johnston
United States Magistrate Judge