From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Otuonye

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jan 26, 2023
6:18-cr-10085-EFM (D. Kan. Jan. 26, 2023)

Opinion

6:18-cr-10085-EFM 6:22- cv-01101-EFM

01-26-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. EBUBE OTUONYE, Defendant-Petitioner,


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ERIC F. MELGREN CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

During the Court's hearing on Defendant-Petitioner Ebube Otuonye's Motion to Proceed Pro Se, it came to the Court's attention that the United States' Response to Defendant's original motion to vacate numbered 103 pages (Doc. 190). When the Response was filed on November 14, 2022, this Court's page limitation for legal briefing was 50 pages. Since then, the Court has reduced its page limitation for briefs to 40 pages. Nothing in the docket suggests that the United States filed a motion to exceed the page limitations prior to filing its Response.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the United States show cause by February 1, 2023, for why its responsive brief-more than twice the length allowed by the Court's page limitation at the time of filing-should not be stricken from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Otuonye

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jan 26, 2023
6:18-cr-10085-EFM (D. Kan. Jan. 26, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Otuonye

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. EBUBE OTUONYE…

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Jan 26, 2023

Citations

6:18-cr-10085-EFM (D. Kan. Jan. 26, 2023)