From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Osuna-Lorona

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 1971
448 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 26338.

September 30, 1971.

Rush G. Glick, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Criminal Division, Phillip W. Johnson, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before KOELSCH, CARTER and CHOY, Circuit Judges.


The judgment and conviction in this narcotics case for transporting and facilitating the sale of 10 ounces of heroin is affirmed. The district court's resolution of conflicting facts concerning the admissibility of appellant's statement must be sustained on appeal, and the 10 year sentence he received does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Gallego v. United States, 276 F.2d 914, 917-918 (9 Cir. 1960); Black v. United States, 269 F.2d 38, 43 (9 Cir. 1959).


Summaries of

United States v. Osuna-Lorona

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 1971
448 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

United States v. Osuna-Lorona

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eduardo OSUNA-LORONA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 30, 1971

Citations

448 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

United States v. Klein

The Supreme Court said in Stanford that the particularity requirement of the fourth amendment had to be…

People v. Raicevich

The present case involves stolen handguns, and the basis for the seizure has nothing whatever to do with…