From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Osorio-Perez

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 6, 2021
01:S2 16crim826-08 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2021)

Opinion

01:S2 16crim826-08 (LTS)

08-06-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARLOS OSORIO-PEREZ


USM # 78689-054

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) (COMPASSIONATE RELEASE)

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN JUDGE

Upon motion of S the defendant [ ] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons for a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), and after considering the applicable factors provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[X] GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Decision and Order filed herewith.

[ ] Tire defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment of ___ is reduced to___. If this sentence is less than the amount of time the defendant already served, the sentence is reduced to a time served; or

[ ] Time served.

If the defendant's sentence is reduced to time served:

[ ] This order is stayed for up to fourteen days, for the verification of the defendant's residence and/or establishment of a release plan, to make appropriate travel arrangements, and to ensure the defendant's safe release. The defendant shall be released as soon as a residence is verified, a release plan is established, appropriate travel arrangements are made, and it is safe for the defendant to travel. There shall be no delay in ensuring travel arrangements are made. If more than fomteen days are needed to make appropriate travel arrangements and ensure the defendant's safe release, the parties shall immediately notify the court and show cause why the stay should be extended: or
[ ] There being a verified residence and an appropriate release plan in place, this order is stayed for up to fourteen days to make appropriate travel arrangements and to ensure the defendant's safe release. The defendant shall be released as soon as appropriate travel arrangements are made and it is safe for the defendant to travel. There shall be no delay in ensuring travel arrangements are made. If more than fourteen days are needed to make appropriate travel arrangements and ensure the defendant's safe release, then the parties shall immediately notify the com! and show cause why the stay should be extended.

[ ] The defendant must provide the complete address where the defendant will reside upon release to the probation office in the district where they will be released because it was not included in the motion for sentence reduction.

[ ] Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), the defendant is ordered to seive a “special term” of

[ ] probation or [ ] supervised release of ___ months (not to exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment).

[ ] The defendant's previously imposed conditions of supervised release apply to the “special term” of supervision; or
[ ] The conditions of the “special term” of supervision are as follows:
[ ] The defendant's previously imposed conditions of supervised release are unchanged.
[X] The defendant's previously imposed conditions of supervised release are modified as follows:
The defendant shall serve five years of supervised release, subject to the conditions -----set forth in the judgment entered in this case at docket entry no. 179. During the first six months of his supervised release term, Mr. Osorio-Perez will also be subject to an additional special condition of six months of home detention. During the home detention period, Mr. Osorio-Perez may leave the approved residence only for work, medical treatment, and other activities approved by the United States Probation Office. Home detention is to be monitored by technology at the discretion of the probation officer.

[ ] DEFERRED pending supplemental briefing and/or a hearing. The coin! DIRECTS the United States Attorney to file a response on or before___, along with all Bureau of Prisons records (medical, institutional, administrative) relevant to this motion.

[ ] DENIED after complete review of the motion on the merits.

[ ] FACTORS CONSIDERED (Optional)

[ ] DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the defendant has not exhausted all administrative remedies as required in 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), nor have 30 days lapsed since receipt of the defendant's request by the warden of the defendant's facility.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Osorio-Perez

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 6, 2021
01:S2 16crim826-08 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Osorio-Perez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARLOS OSORIO-PEREZ

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 6, 2021

Citations

01:S2 16crim826-08 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2021)

Citing Cases

United States v. Santiago

Conn. Mar. 19, 2020); U.S. v. Rountree, 2020 Dist. LEXIS 91064(N.D.N.Y. May 18, 2020); U.S. v. Galloway, 2020…