From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Osorio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
CR. No. 2:10-CR-00102 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CR. No. 2:10-CR-00102 LKK

07-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Nicolas OSORIO, et al., Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney PAUL A. HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

PAUL A. HEMESATH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER

DATE: July 10, 2012

COURT: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Paul Hemesath, counsel for Plaintiff, and Paul Irish for Nicolas OSORIO, that the above status conference be rescheduled from this Court's July 10, 2012, calendar, and that the matter be re-calendared for August 28, 2012, at 9:15 a.m. This request is made jointly by the government and defense in order to permit time for continued preparation, including investigation which is currently in progress, and plea negotiations. The parties agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time be excluded through August 28, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), Local Code T-4.

______________________

Paul Hemesath

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

______________________

Paul Irish

Counsel for Defendant

Nicolas OSORIO

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the July 10, 2012, status conference hearing be continued to August 28, 2012, at 9:15 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time up to and including the August 28, 2012 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Osorio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
CR. No. 2:10-CR-00102 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Osorio

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Nicolas OSORIO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

CR. No. 2:10-CR-00102 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)