Opinion
No. 19-10031
11-25-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALI MUKHTAR OSMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 4:17-cr-00198-JAS-DTF-1 MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Ali Mukhtar Osman appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and sentence of time served plus ten days for unlawful bringing in of a firearm or ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(l), 924(a)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Osman's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Osman the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.