From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ortiz Portillo

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 17, 2006
171 F. App'x 657 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted March 8, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Wayne Parks, Tehachapi, CA, pro se.

Daniel J. Kossick, Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00921-CAS.

Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Jesus Tomas Ortiz Portillo appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand to the sentencing court for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005). On remand, the district court shall amend the judgment to reflect the statute of conviction.

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ortiz Portillo

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 17, 2006
171 F. App'x 657 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Ortiz Portillo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Jesus Tomas ORTIZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 17, 2006

Citations

171 F. App'x 657 (9th Cir. 2006)