From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ortega

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
No. CR-13-058 EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR-13-058 EMC

03-12-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO GARCIA ORTEGA, Defendant.

STEVEN G. KALAR Federal Public Defender Counsel for Defendant GARCIA ORTEGA MARK KANG Special Assistant United States Attorney JODI LINKER Assistant Federal Public Defender


STEVEN G. KALAR
Federal Public Defender
JODI LINKER
Assistant Federal Public Defender
19th Floor Federal Building
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: (415) 436-7700
Counsel for Defendant GARCIA ORTEGA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE

The parties jointly request that, subject to the Court's approval, the status conference and/or change of plea hearing presently set for March 13, 2013 be continued to April 3, 2013 at 2:15 pm.

At the last appearance, the Court set the above-captioned matter over until March 13, 2013 for possible change of plea. Defense counsel has been investigating certain matters and has requested that government counsel consider an issue related to Mr. Garcia-Ortega's prior removal. The parties are in negotiations over a potential resolution of the matter in light of these issues, and require more time to complete those negotiations, as well as to further investigate the case. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the appearance be continued from March 13, 2013 to April 3, 2013.

For the above reasons, the parties stipulate there is good cause - taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of this case - to exclude the time February 28, 2013 to April 3, 2013 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act, and that failing to exclude that time would unreasonably deny the defendant and his counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation and continuity of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). The parties further agree that the ends of justice would be served by excluding the time from February 28, 2013 to April 3, 2013 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act and that the need for the exclusion outweighs the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

____________

MARK KANG

Special Assistant United States Attorney

____________

JODI LINKER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Edward M. Chen


Summaries of

United States v. Ortega

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2013
No. CR-13-058 EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Ortega

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO GARCIA ORTEGA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

No. CR-13-058 EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)