From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ontiveros-Rodrigues

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 12, 2012
Criminal Action No. 12-cr-00014-REB (D. Colo. Jul. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 12-cr-00014-REB

07-12-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2. EFRAIN ONTIVEROS-RODRIGUES, Defendant.

Counsel: Barbara Skalla Brian Leedy


Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Courtroom Deputy: Nel Steffens

Court Reporter: Tracy Weir

Interpreter: Marcela Salazar

Probation Officer: Sergio Garza

Counsel:

Barbara Skalla

Brian Leedy

SENTENCING MINUTES

2:09 p.m. Court in session.

Appearances of counsel.

Defendant is present in custody.

Interpreter is sworn; parties stipulate as to interpreter's qualifications.

Court's opening remarks.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3552 and Fed.R.Crim.P. 32, the Probation Department has conducted a presentence investigation and has filed a presentence report and addendum.

Counsel for the government confirms that counsel has read the presentence report and addendum.

Counsel for the defendant informs the court that counsel has read and discussed the presentence report and addendum with the defendant.

Defendant's counsel makes a statement on behalf of the defendant, offers information in mitigation of punishment, comments on the probation officer's sentencing guideline applications and calculations, and comments on matters relating to the appropriate sentence.

Defendant is sworn.

Statement by the defendant.

Statement by counsel for the government. Government orally moves to dismiss with prejudice Count 3 of the Indictment.

The court makes a sentencing statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) and enters findings of fact, conclusions of law, judgment of conviction, sentence, and orders.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the plea agreement of the parties as presented in Court's Exhibits 1, 1a, 2, and 2a is formally approved;
2. That the pending motions are resolved as follows:
• the Defendant's Motion for Downward Sentencing Variance [#40] filed June 15, 2012, is GRANTED insofar as it is consistent with the foregoing findings and conclusions and the following orders;
• the Government's Motion Regarding Acceptance of Responsibility [#51] filed July 11, 2012, is GRANTED;
• the Government's Motion for Downward Departure Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 [#52] filed July 11, 2012, is GRANTED;
• the government's oral motion to dismiss with prejudice Count 3 of the Indictment is GRANTED;
3. That judgment of conviction under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(k) is entered on Count One of the Indictment;
4. That pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment and sentence of this court that the defendant is committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of fifteen (15) months;
5. That on release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of five (5) years; provided furthermore, that within 72 hours of defendant's release from imprisonment and the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, the defendant shall report in person to the U.S. probation department within the district to which he is released;
6. That while on supervised release, the defendant shall comply with the following conditions of supervised release:
• all mandatory conditions of supervised release, prescribed by law at 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) and USSG §5D1.3(a);
• all standard conditions of supervised release approved and imposed by this court in all such cases and circumstances; and
• the following explicit or special conditions of supervised release:
• that the defendant shall not violate any federal, state, or municipal statute, regulation, or ordinance in any jurisdiction or place where defendant may be during the term of supervised release;
• that the defendant shall not possess or use illegally controlled substances;
• that the defendant shall not possess or use any firearm or destructive device as defined under federal law at 18 U.S.C. § 921;
• that the defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a sample of defendant's DNA;
• that if the defendant is removed from this country, then defendant shall not re-enter without the lawful approval and authority of the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security;
• that if the defendant is removed from and then granted permission to lawfully return to this country, defendant shall
report to the nearest United States Probation Department within 72 hours of defendant's lawful return to this country;
7. That no fine is imposed;
8. That the defendant shall pay forthwith a special victim's fund assessment fee of $100.00;
9. That the mandatory drug-testing provisions of 18 U.S.C.. § 3583(d) are waived;
10. That presentence confinement credit shall be determined by the Bureau of Prisons under 18 U.S.C. § 3585;
11. That an order and judgment of forfeiture shall be entered pursuant to the plea agreement of the parties and the admission of the defendant of the forfeiture allegation of the Indictment and under the authority of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3) and the statutory provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 853; this includes, but is not limited to, $905.00 of U.S. currency; and
12. That the defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

Parties state they have no objections to the sentence imposed.

The defendant waives formal advisement of appeal.

3:03 p.m. Court in recess.

Total time in court: 00:54

Hearing concluded.


Summaries of

United States v. Ontiveros-Rodrigues

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 12, 2012
Criminal Action No. 12-cr-00014-REB (D. Colo. Jul. 12, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Ontiveros-Rodrigues

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2. EFRAIN ONTIVEROS-RODRIGUES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 12, 2012

Citations

Criminal Action No. 12-cr-00014-REB (D. Colo. Jul. 12, 2012)