From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. One 2003 Peterbilt 379 Semi-Tractor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
Case No. CV 13-1710 FMO (MANx) (C.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-1710 FMO (MANx)

05-10-2013

United States of America v. One 2003 Peterbilt 379 Semi-Tractor

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None Present Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin , United States District Judge

+------------------------------------------+ ¦Vanessa Figueroa¦None Present ¦ +----------------+-------------------------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk ¦Court Reporter / Recorder¦ +------------------------------------------+

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

None Present

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None Present

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal Re: Lack of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Generally, a defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a). The court may dismiss the action prior to the 120 days, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before May 17, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b), the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response, if plaintiff/defendant files [ ] Proof(s) of service of summons and complaint on the following defendant(s): X An answer by the following defendant(s): One 2003 Peterbilt 379 Semi-Tractor X Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a): One 2003 Peterbilt 379 Semi-Tractor [ ] Plaintiff's motion for default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b): on or before the date indicated above, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.

00 : 00

Initials of Preparer vdr


Summaries of

United States v. One 2003 Peterbilt 379 Semi-Tractor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
Case No. CV 13-1710 FMO (MANx) (C.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. One 2003 Peterbilt 379 Semi-Tractor

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. One 2003 Peterbilt 379 Semi-Tractor

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 13-1710 FMO (MANx) (C.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)