From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Okelley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 14, 2005
134 F. App'x 178 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Jo Ann Farrington, Esq., USAK--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff--Appellee.

Kenneth E. Kanev, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Defendant--Appellant. D.C. No. CR-02-00067-RRB.


Before: HALL, KLEINFELD, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We remand the sentence imposed in this case to the district court, without vacating the sentence, to follow the procedure established in the en banc decision of United States v. Ameline, and to consider whether the sentence would have been materially different in light of United States v. Booker.

United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

United States v. Booker, --- U.S. ----, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).


Summaries of

United States v. Okelley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 14, 2005
134 F. App'x 178 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Okelley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Keane Z. OKELLEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 14, 2005

Citations

134 F. App'x 178 (9th Cir. 2005)