From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Oginni

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 21, 2023
No. 22-7215 (4th Cir. Mar. 21, 2023)

Opinion

22-7215 22-7216

03-21-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL IBUKUN OGINNI, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL IBUKUN OGINNI, Defendant-Appellant.

Michael Ibukun Oginni, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: March 16, 2023

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O'Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cr-00231-LO-1; 1:20-cv-01596-LO; 1:17-cr-00172-LO-1; 1:20-cv-01598-LO)

Michael Ibukun Oginni, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Michael Ibukun Oginni seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Oginni has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Oginni

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 21, 2023
No. 22-7215 (4th Cir. Mar. 21, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Oginni

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL IBUKUN OGINNI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 21, 2023

Citations

No. 22-7215 (4th Cir. Mar. 21, 2023)