From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ocadiz-Castro

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 3, 2023
2:20-cr-00156-RFB-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cr-00156-RFB-DJA

10-03-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEBASTIAN OCADIZ-CASTRO, Defendant.

JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney JACOB H. OPERSKALSKI Assistant United States Attorney JOSHUA TOMSHECK Counsel for Sebastian Ocadiz-Castro


JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney JACOB H. OPERSKALSKI Assistant United States Attorney

JOSHUA TOMSHECK Counsel for Sebastian Ocadiz-Castro

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RESPONSE DEADLINE

HONORABLE RICHARD F. BOULWARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties, by and through the undersigned, respectfully request that the Court continue the deadline to respond to the defendant's Motion for Return of Property Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g), ECF Doc. 525.

The parties stipulate that the government shall have until October 17, 2023, to respond to the defendant's motion.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Based on the pending stipulation of the parties, and upon the Court's finding of good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

The government shall have until October 17, 2023, to respond to the defendant's Motion for Return of Property Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g), ECF Doc. 525.


Summaries of

United States v. Ocadiz-Castro

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 3, 2023
2:20-cr-00156-RFB-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Ocadiz-Castro

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEBASTIAN OCADIZ-CASTRO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 3, 2023

Citations

2:20-cr-00156-RFB-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2023)