From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. O'Brien

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 22, 2005
143 F. App'x 902 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted September 12, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Darin Lahood, AUSA, USLV-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Arthur L. Allen, FPDNV-Federal Public Defender's Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Roger L. Hunt, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00090-RLH.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Wayne Michael O'Brien appeals his 37-month sentence following a guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. O'Brien

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 22, 2005
143 F. App'x 902 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. O'Brien

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Wayne Michael O'BRIEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 22, 2005

Citations

143 F. App'x 902 (9th Cir. 2005)