From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Obert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
Case No.: CR 04-20107 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: CR 04-20107 RMW

10-20-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY RONALD OBERT, Defendant.

LARA S. VINNARD Assistant Federal Public Defender CAROLYNE SANIN Special Assistant United States Attorney


BARRY J. PORTMAN
Federal Public Defender
LARA S. VINNARD
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Counsel for Defendant OBERT

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

HEARING AND TO RELEASE PSR TO

COUNSEL; [] ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING AND

ORDERING RELEASE OF PSR TO

COUNSEL

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

Defendant Timothy Ronald Obert and the government, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that, subject to the Court's approval, the hearing in the above-captioned matter, presently scheduled for Monday, October 24, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., be continued to Monday, November 21, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.

The hearing in this case was requested by Mr. Obert because he objects to certain additional conditions of supervised release proposed by the Probation Office. The defense seeks to continue the hearing because additional time has been needed for defense counsel and Mr. Obert to research their objections and prepare effectively. The Probation Office has been contacted and has no objection to the proposed new date.

The parties stipulate to the following revised briefing schedule: defense brief due October 11, 2011; government response due November 7, 2011; defense reply due November 14, 2011.

Additionally, the parties stipulate that the Court should order the Probation Office to release a copy of the Presentence Report to the parties. Undersigned defense counsel does not have a copy of the PSR because she did not represent Mr. Obert at his sentencing hearing. The defense has requested a copy of the PSR from the Probation Office, and has been advised that the PSR may be released to defense counsel following the issuance of an appropriate order.

LARA S. VINNARD

Assistant Federal Public Defender

CAROLYNE SANIN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

[] ORDER

The parties have jointly requested that the hearing presently set for Monday, October 24, 2011, be continued to Monday, November 21, 2011, because the defense requires additional time to submit its brief objecting to proposed additional probation conditions.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing date presently set for October 24, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., be continued to November 21, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. The defense brief is due October 11, 2011; the government's response is due November 7, 2011; any defense reply is due November 14, 2011.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Probation Office shall release copies of the Presentence Report to counsel.

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Obert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
Case No.: CR 04-20107 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Obert

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY RONALD OBERT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

Case No.: CR 04-20107 RMW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)