From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nunley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
CASE NO. 08-65-LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 08-65-LKK

09-12-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TANEKA NUNLEY, Defendant.

DAN KOUKOL Attorney for defendant Taneka Nunley DAN KOUKOL FOR Todd Leras Assistant U.S. Attorney


DAN KOUKOL

Attorney at Law

State Bar No. 122526

Attorney for Defendant,

TANEKA NUNLEY

STIPULATION AND ORDER

TIME: 9:15 AM

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence Karlton

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through Todd Leras, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant Taneka Raenee Nunley, by and through her attorney, Dan Koukol, that the status conference of September 13, 2011 be vacated and that a status conference be set for November 1, 2011 at 9:15 AM.

Prior activity of Ms. Nunley's codefendant caused this case to be delayed up to the point of his sentencing. At this time, a continuance is being requested because the parties are attempting to finalize an appropriate resolution for Ms. Nunley.

Counsel agree that the time between the signing of the requested order and September 13, 2011 will be excluded from the speedy trial calculation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) (Local Code T4) in that the defendants' and the public's interest in a speedy trial are outweighed by the interests of justice in permitting counsel adequate time to prepare.

Respectfully submitted,

DAN KOUKOL

Attorney for defendant Taneka Nunley

Respectfully submitted,

DAN KOUKOL FOR

Todd Leras

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

UPONG GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of the parties, it is ordered that the status conference, scheduled for September 13, 2011, be vacated and the matter continued to November 1, 2011, at 9:15 a.m. for further conference. Based on the parties' representation the Court finds that the ends of justice be granting a continuance outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time up to and including the November 1, 2011 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S. C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Nunley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
CASE NO. 08-65-LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Nunley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TANEKA NUNLEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 08-65-LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)