From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Noushfar

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 1, 1998
140 F.3d 1244 (9th Cir. 1998)

Opinion

Nos. 94-30229, 94-30350, 94-30353

Argued and Submitted January 8, 1996 — Seattle, Washington.

Filed April 1, 1998


ORDER

The Opinion filed on March 20, 1996, 78 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir. 1996), is amended as follows:

The first sentence of the final paragraph on page 1445 of the opinion as published, beginning with "In Riley v. Deeds . . . .," is replaced to read:

In Riley v. Deeds, 56 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 1995), we found structural error when testimony was reread in court without the judge present and with his clerk "presiding."


Summaries of

United States v. Noushfar

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 1, 1998
140 F.3d 1244 (9th Cir. 1998)
Case details for

United States v. Noushfar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MASSOUD NOUSHFAR; ZOHREH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 1, 1998

Citations

140 F.3d 1244 (9th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

Sanders v. City of Bakersfield

In another case that is factually similar to this one, the Ninth Circuit found the search was not a valid…

U.S. v. Jones

Reflecting a policy that prosecutors be allowed to use their discretion to bring charges as a bargaining chip…