From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nichols

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 19, 2015
2:13-CR-00400 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2015)

Opinion

          RUSSELL W. MILLER, JR., Miller Law Group, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendant, BRET ALLAN NICHOLS.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         It is hereby stipulated and agreed to by Bret Allan Nichols, by and through his counsel Russell W. Miller, Jr., and the United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney William Wong, that the change of plea hearing presently set for Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. be vacated and rescheduled for a change of plea hearing on May 28, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

         A continuance of the change of plea hearing is necessary because, Russell W. Miller, Jr., attorney for the defendant, was admitted to the emergency room at Sutter Memorial Hospital on the morning of March 5, 2015 due to internal bleeding and urinary blockage. Mr. Miller was released on March 6, 2015 only to be re-admitted the following morning. The medications prescribed to arrest the bleeding were negatively affecting recently performed heart procedures. During this hospitalization a transfusion was required due to significant blood loss. As a result of the hospitalizations, recovery and numerous doctor appointments, Russell W. Miller, Jr. has not had adequate time to review the plea agreement with the defendant. Therefore, the parties request that the change of plea hearing be continued to May 28, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

         The parties further stipulate that the time from the currently set change of plea hearing on March 19, 2015, through May 28, 2015, the requested date for the continued hearing, should be excluded from computation of the time period in which trial should commence under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, the ends of justice would be served by the Court excluding that time period from computation due to defense counsel's illness and hospitalizations and the need for defense counsel to have adequate time for preparation. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.

         For these reasons, Mr. Nichols, his counsel and the government stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance of the change of plea hearing outweigh the best interests of the public and Mr. Nichols in a speedy trial.

          ORDER

         IT IS ORDERED that the change of plea hearing currently scheduled for March 19, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. is continued to May 28, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. For the reasons stipulated by the parties, good cause exists pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act beginning March 19, 2015 through May 28, 2015. For the reason set forth in the stipulation of the parties, the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and Mr. Nichols in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (Local Code T4).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Nichols

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 19, 2015
2:13-CR-00400 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Nichols

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRET ALLAN NICHOLS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 19, 2015

Citations

2:13-CR-00400 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2015)