From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nicholas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Nov 10, 2020
No. 20-10649 (11th Cir. Nov. 10, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-10649

11-10-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTHONY NICHOLAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00023=PGB-EJK-2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before MARTIN, NEWSOM and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Roger L. Weeden, appointed counsel for Anthony Nicholas, Jr., in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Nicholas's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Nicholas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Nov 10, 2020
No. 20-10649 (11th Cir. Nov. 10, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Nicholas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTHONY NICHOLAS, JR.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 10, 2020

Citations

No. 20-10649 (11th Cir. Nov. 10, 2020)