From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nicholas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 17, 2016
6:15-CV-1430 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2016)

Opinion

6:15-CV-1430

02-17-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. THOMAS NICHOLAS, Defendant.


AMENDED DECISION & ORDER

The Plaintiff moves for default judgment in this action concerning an unpaid student-loan obligation. The United States filed this action on December 2, 2015, alleging that Defendant Thomas Nicholas signed a promissory note, that the Plaintiff had demanded payment, and Defendant had failed to meet his obligation. See dkt. # 1.

Defendant was served with the Complaint, but did not file an answer. See dkt. # 4. On January 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default with the Court. See dkt. # 5. The Court entered default on the same day See dkt. # 7. Plaintiff then filed the instant motion for default judgment, dkt. #9, asserting that Defendant's unpaid obligation amounted to $4,375.35 in unpaid principal, $387.36 in accrued interest through January 5, 2016, and interest from the date of judgment at 3.12% per year. See dkt. # 9. Plaintiff also seeks $25 in costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1921.

Though the Court is to "[accept] as true all well pleaded allegations against a defaulting defendant for purposes of determining liability," the Plaintiff is still required to present evidence to establish the amount of damages. Finkel v. Romanowicz, 577 F.3d 79, 83 n.6 (2d Cir. 2009). Thus, "the quantum of damages must be established by proof unless the amount is liquidated or susceptible to mathematical computation." Flaks v. Koegel, 504 F.2d 702, 707 (2d Cir. 1974). Though "'the court must ensure that there is a basis for the damages specified in a default judgment, it may, but need not, make the determination through a hearing.'" Bravado Int'l Group Merch. Servcs. v. Ninna, Inc., 655 F.Supp.2d 177, 190 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (quoting Fustok v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 122 F.R.D. 151, 156 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)). Instead, "the court may rely on detailed affidavits or documentary evidence . . . to evaluate the proposed sum." Fustok, 122 F.R.D. at 156.

The record in this case, which includes the original loan contract as an exhibit to the Complaint and affidavits from the Plaintiff's attorney, provides sufficient evidence by which the Court can calculate the amount of damages to which the United States is entitled. Therefore, based on the evidence supplied by the Plaintiff, the Court will GRANT the motion for default judgment, dkt. #9. Judgment is hereby granted against Defendant Thomas Nicholas in the following amounts:

1. Principal Balance $ 4,375.35

Total Interest Accrued $ 387.36

Total $ 4,762.71; and

2. Interest to be calculated at 3.12% per annum from the date of judgment.

3. Plaintiff is also entitled to costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1921 for service and travel of $ 25.00.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 17, 2016

/s/_________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Nicholas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 17, 2016
6:15-CV-1430 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Nicholas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. THOMAS NICHOLAS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 17, 2016

Citations

6:15-CV-1430 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2016)