From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Niblock

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2012
469 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7456

03-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES R. NIBLOCK, Defendant - Appellant.

James Niblock, Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Dana James Boente, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:02-cr-00568-GBL-1)

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Niblock, Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Dana James Boente, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James R. Niblock appeals the district court's order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment to which he pled guilty in 2003. The district court denied relief for the reasons stated in its prior orders denying Niblock's numerous prior challenges to his conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record in this case and have determined that the district court properly denied Niblock's motion to dismiss the indictment. We therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Niblock

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2012
469 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Niblock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES R. NIBLOCK…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 19, 2012

Citations

469 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2012)