From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nhung Thi Vu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2012
NO. 2:10-cr-00284 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 2:10-cr-00284 MCE

07-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NHUNG THI VU, et al., Defendants.

DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender MATTHEW C. BOCKMON Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant NHUNG THI VU DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant HUNG NGOC PHAM MARK REICHEL Attorney for Defendant CUONG THOI LONG DAVID FISCHER Attorney for Defendant THUY THI TRAN ERIN RADEKIN Attorney for Defendant DIEP HOANG VU BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney TODD LERAS Assistant United States Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

Matthew C. Bockmon, Bar # 161566

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

NHUNG THI VU

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE AND TO EXCLUDE

TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL

ACT


Date: August 9, 2012

Judge: Morrison C. England, Jr.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through Todd Leras, Assistant U.S. Attorney, defendant NHUNG THI VU, by and through his counsel, Matthew C. Bockmon, Assistant Federal Defender, defendant HUNG NGOC PHAM, by and through her counsel, Dina Santos, defendant CUONG THOI LONG, by and through his counsel, Mark Reichel, defendant THUY THI TRAN by and through her counsel David Fischer, and, defendant DIEP HOANG VU, by and through his counsel, Erin Radekin, that the status conference hearing date of Thursday, July 19, 2012, be vacated and a new status conference hearing date of Thursday, August 9, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., be set.

The reason for this continuance is because proposed plea agreements for each of the defendants are forthcoming from the government, and defense counsel will need additional time for consideration of the plea agreements and consultation with the clients once they are received. The Court is advised that all parties concur with this request, and have authorized Mr. Bockmon to sign the stipulation on their behalf.

It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, July 17, 2012, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, August 9, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare], and that the ends of justice to be served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

______________________

MATTHEW C. BOCKMON

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

NHUNG THI VU

______________________

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

HUNG NGOC PHAM

______________________

MARK REICHEL

Attorney for Defendant

CUONG THOI LONG

______________________

DAVID FISCHER

Attorney for Defendant

THUY THI TRAN

______________________

ERIN RADEKIN

Attorney for Defendant

DIEP HOANG VU

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

______________________

TODD LERAS

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties, filed on July 19, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference currently scheduled for Thursday, July 19, 2012, be vacated and that the case be set for status conference on Thursday, August 9, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the parties' July 19, 2012, stipulation, the time under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded from the date of this stipulation, July 17, 2012, through and including August 9, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4, due to the need to provide defense counsel with the reasonable time to prepare.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Nhung Thi Vu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2012
NO. 2:10-cr-00284 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Nhung Thi Vu

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NHUNG THI VU, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 19, 2012

Citations

NO. 2:10-cr-00284 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)