From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nenna

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 11, 1968
393 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 503, Docket 32251.

Argued April 11, 1968.

Decided April 11, 1968. Certiorari Denied June 17, 1968. See 88 S.Ct. 2323.

Leon B. Polsky, New York City (Anthony F. Marra, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner-appellant.

Robert D. MacLachlan, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., New York City (Frank S. Hogan, Dist. Atty., and H. Richard Uviller, Asst. Dist. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.


We affirm in open court, for the reasons stated in Judge Frankel's opinion, 282 F. Supp. 754 (S.D.N.Y. 1968), the denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We reject the contention made by petitioner, who is awaiting trial in the state court on charges of robbery, grand larceny, assault and possession of a loaded pistol, that he has been placed in double jeopardy in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights, the state court having declared a mistrial in a prior trial on the same charges after a jury was impaneled, but before the introduction of any evidence, because the state's witnesses were unavailable after a four day continuance.

We direct that the mandate issue forthwith.


Summaries of

United States v. Nenna

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 11, 1968
393 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1968)
Case details for

United States v. Nenna

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES ex rel. Roy BLAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hon. Albert…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 1968

Citations

393 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Mizell v. Attorney General of State of N.Y

In Downum v. United States, supra, it became established law that if a defendant were tried in a federal…

Mizell v. Attorney General of State of N.Y.

The Downum case established that under the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment a defendant is…