From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nekrasova

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 14, 2011
Case No. CR - 11-00295 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CR - 11-00295 MCE

10-14-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OLGA NEKRASOVA Defendant.

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C. JENNIFER C. NOBLE Attorney for Defendant OLGA NEKRASOVA BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DANIEL McCONKIE, JR. Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403

JENNIFER C. NOBLE, ESQ., CSBN 256952

JACQUELYN E. LARSON, ESQ., CSBN 264712

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

Attorney for Defendant

Olga Nekrasova

AMENDED STIPULATION AND

ORDER TO U.S. PROBATION TO

PREPARE A PRE-PLEA

PRESENTENCE REPORT

The parties, Daniel McConkie, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, and Jennifer C. Noble, attorney for defendant Olga Nekrasova; hereby stipulate and agree to the following:

1. The parties request that the Court order U.S. Probation to prepare a pre-plea pre-sentence report including a criminal record check and a preliminary guideline calculations.

2. The parties agree to provide copies of any criminal records information to U.S. Probation to facilitate the preparation of the report. The parties believe that they have already obtained certified copies of most of the significant criminal history documents needed for a guideline calculation.

3. The parties believe that this pre-plea presentence report will facilitate a plea agreement, and will facilitate the preparation of a final presentence report. The parties believe that the report will take no more than five weeks to complete.

Additionally, the parties, the United States of America and the defendant, hereby agree and stipulate that the ends of justice served by the ordering the U.S. Probation Office to conduct this pre-plea pre-sentence outweighs the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare, discuss plea agreement and possible resolution with government, and analyze how best to proceed with the case) from the date of the parties' stipulation, October 12, 2011, to and including November 17, 2011. The Court previously excluded time pursuant to Local Code T4 through October 14, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

JENNIFER C. NOBLE

Attorney for Defendant

OLGA NEKRASOVA

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DANIEL McCONKIE, JR.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court adopts the stipulation of counsel set forth above, and it is hereby ordered that U.S. Probation prepare a pre-plea pre-sentence report including a criminal record check and a preliminary guideline calculations.

FURTHER, The Court finds that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

THEREFORE, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 from the date of this order to November 17, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Nekrasova

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 14, 2011
Case No. CR - 11-00295 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Nekrasova

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OLGA NEKRASOVA Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

Case No. CR - 11-00295 MCE (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)