From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Musgrave

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Apr 26, 2018
Case No. 3:11-cr-183 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 26, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cr-183

04-26-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAUL DAVID MUSGRAVE, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 288), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, and for good cause shown upon the Court's de novo review, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, the restitution order in this case is modified to require that David Musgrave pay $2,000 per month toward restitution. It is further ORDERED that the supersedeas bond be dissolved and the cash posted by Barbara Musgrave be returned to her. April 26, 2018

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Musgrave

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Apr 26, 2018
Case No. 3:11-cr-183 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 26, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Musgrave

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAUL DAVID MUSGRAVE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

Date published: Apr 26, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cr-183 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 26, 2018)