From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Murry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2012
No. 2:11-CR-103 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CR-103 MCE

01-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KESHON MURRY, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413 Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant KESHON MURRY


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

KESHON MURRY

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE


Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Morrison C. England, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Jill Thomas, counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey L. Staniels, counsel for defendant, KESHON MURRY, that the status conference now set for January 5, 2012 be vacated and the matter continued to February 23, 2012, to allow additional time for the preparation and review of a presentence report.

The court is advised that delay in meeting the schedule set by the court, CR 31, has been due to a spate of retirements in the Probation Office and, more recently, to schedule conflicts in arranging for an interview of the defendant (which now has occurred). In light of the heavy current caseload of the Probation Officer, he has promised the draft report "as soon as he can." Counsel for Mr. Murry believes that report may not produce significant objections and therefore proposes to respond to the probation officer informally one week after receipt of the report, and to file any objections together with a stipulated adjustment of the sentencing date, if necessary, one week after receipt of the final report.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 et. seq., is not implicated by this post entry of guilty plea continuance.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

____________

JILL THOMAS

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

____________

Jeffrey L. Staniels

Assistant Federal Defender

Counsel for Defendant

KESHON MURRY

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Murry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2012
No. 2:11-CR-103 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Murry

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KESHON MURRY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 6, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-CR-103 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)