From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Murray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 6, 2013
Case No. CR 12-0278 EMC (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CR 12-0278 EMC

05-06-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES MURRAY, Defendant.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP MARC H. AXELBAUM (SBN 209855) ERICA N. TURCIOS (SBN 271655) Attorneys for Defendant JAMES MURRAY MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney Robin L. Harris Assistant United States Attorney


PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
MARC H. AXELBAUM (SBN 209855)
ERICA N. TURCIOS (SBN 271655)
Attorneys for Defendant
JAMES MURRAY

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONVERTING DATE OF

HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO REVOKE DETENTION

ORDER TO STATUS CONFERENCE

Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Defendant JAMES MURRAY ("Defendant"), HEREBY STIPULATE, through their undersigned counsel, as follows:

1. WHEREAS on February 8, 2013, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James specially appointed Marc H. Axelbaum for the limited purpose of advising Defendant regarding certain conflicts of interest the government had stated in a letter to the Court that Defendant allegedly had with his retained counsel, Garrett J. Zelen (Dkt. 96);

2. WHEREAS on February 27, 2013, the government moved to disqualify Mr. Zelen as counsel for Defendant (Dkt. 99);

3. WHEREAS on March 6, 2013, the Court held a hearing on the Government's motion to disqualify Mr. Zelen;

4. WHEREAS on March 11, 2013, the Court issued a written order disqualifying Mr. Zelen (Dkt. 103, p.9);

5. WHEREAS on March 19, 2013, Magistrate Judge Cousins specially appointed Marc H. Axelbaum for the limited purpose of advising Defendant in completing a Financial Declaration in Support of Request for Attorney Under the Criminal Justice Act ("CJA-23 Form");

6. WHEREAS on April 29, 2013, Judge Cousins found Defendant eligible for appointed counsel and appointed Mr. Axelbaum as Defendant's attorney (Dkt. 107);

7. WHEREAS, Mr. Axelbaum has until recently only been appointed for limited purposes in this case and has accordingly not previously attempted to get fully up to speed on the merits of the matter, including regarding the Defendant's Motion to Revoke Magistrate Judge's Order Revoking Defendant's Release on Bond and for de novo Review of the Order (Dkt. 89, "Motion to Revoke"), which was previously set for hearing on May 8, 2013;

8. WHEREAS Defendant and the government have agreed to convert the May 8, 2013 hearing on the Motion to Revoke to a status conference and continue the hearing on the Motion to Revoke to a date to be set at the May 8 conference;

THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant respectfully request that the Court convert the May 8, 2013 hearing on Defendant's Motion to Revoke to a status conference and continue the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Revoke to a date to be determined at the status conference.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

MARC H. AXELBAUM

ERICA N. TURCIOS

Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

By Marc H. Axelbaum

Attorneys for Defendant JAMES MURRAY

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

By ____________________

Robin L. Harris

Assistant United States Attorney

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on good cause shown in the foregoing Stipulation, the Court hereby converts the hearing on the Motion to Revoke Detention Order ("Motion") set for May 8, 2013, at 2:30 p.m, to a status conference; and (2) continues the hearing on the Motion to a date to be determined at the May 8 status conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Honorable Edward M. Chen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Murray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 6, 2013
Case No. CR 12-0278 EMC (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES MURRAY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. CR 12-0278 EMC (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)