From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Murray

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Aug 11, 2014
575 F. App'x 855 (11th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-14892

08-11-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TIQUELA N. MURRAY, a.k.a. Kisha Jones, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00275-JRH-BKE-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Before WILSON, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Andrew A. Murdison, appointed counsel for Tiquela N. Murray, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion is GRANTED, and Murray's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Murray

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Aug 11, 2014
575 F. App'x 855 (11th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TIQUELA N. MURRAY, a.k.a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 11, 2014

Citations

575 F. App'x 855 (11th Cir. 2014)