From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Murphy

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 27, 2024
4:20-CR-00052-01-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 27, 2024)

Opinion

4:20-CR-00052-01-LPR

02-27-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. BARRY GLYNN MURPHY DEFENDANT


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence (Doc. 68) is DENIED.

Applying retroactive Guidelines Amendment 821 does not change Defendant's applicable guideline range. Although his criminal history score goes from 15 to 14, his criminal history category and sentencing range remain the same.

See U.S.S.G 1.10 (a)(2) (“Exclusions.-A reduction in the defendant's term of imprisonment is not consistent with this policy statement and therefore is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) if- . . . an amendment listed in subsection (d) does not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range.”).

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

United States v. Murphy

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 27, 2024
4:20-CR-00052-01-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 27, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. BARRY GLYNN MURPHY DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 27, 2024

Citations

4:20-CR-00052-01-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 27, 2024)