From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Murphy

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 8, 2023
2:22-CR-00124-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-CR-00124-JAD-DJA

08-08-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KAMAYA MURPHY, Defendants.

OSVALDO E. FUMO, ESQ., Nevada Bar No. 5956, PITARO & FUMO CHTD., Attorney for Defendant KAMAYA MURPHY. KIMBERLY SOKOLICH, Assistant United States Attorney.


OSVALDO E. FUMO, ESQ., Nevada Bar No. 5956, PITARO & FUMO CHTD., Attorney for Defendant KAMAYA MURPHY.

KIMBERLY SOKOLICH, Assistant United States Attorney.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between KIMBERLY SOKOLICH, and SUPRIYA PRASAD, Assistant United States Attorneys, counsel for the United States of America, and OSVALDO E. FUMO, ESQ., counsel for KAMAYA MURPHY, that the Sentencing Hearing currently scheduled for August 9, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and reset or a date and time convenient to the court, but not earlier than 30 days.

1. Counsel for defendant has spoken to his client and she has no objection to the request of continuance.

2. Defendant is out on pretrial release.

3. Counsel for the government does not object to the continuance.

4. Counsels needs additional time to prepare for sentencing.

5. Counsel is currently in a State murder jury trial, State of Nevada v Ray Anderson and anticipates to be done on Tuesday, August 8, 2023, then begins another murder jury trial the following week if it does not negotiate.

6. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage justice.

7. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the Sentencing Hearing until a date and time convenient to the court.

This is the 1st request for continuance filed herein.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Counsel for defendant has spoken to his client and she has no objection to the request of continuance.

2. Defendant is out on pretrial release.

3. Counsel for the government does not object to the continuance.

4. Counsels needs additional time to prepare for sentencing.

5. Counsel is currently in a State murder jury trial, State of Nevada v Ray Anderson and anticipates to be done on Tuesday, August 8, 2023, then begins another murder jury trial the following week if it does not negotiate.

6. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage justice.

7. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the Sentencing Hearing until a date and time convenient to the court.

This is the 1st request for continuance filed herein.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Denial of this request for continuance would deny the parties herein the opportunity to effectively and thoroughly prepare for Sentencing Hearing.

Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Sentencing Hearing currently scheduled for August 9, 2023, at 10:30 a.m., be continued to September 18, 2023, at 10:00 a.m.


Summaries of

United States v. Murphy

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 8, 2023
2:22-CR-00124-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KAMAYA MURPHY, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 8, 2023

Citations

2:22-CR-00124-JAD-DJA (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2023)