From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Munoz-Medina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 10, 2012
No. 11-10517 (9th Cir. Sep. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-10517 D.C. No. 2:11-cr-01277-GMS

09-10-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDUARDO MUNOZ-MEDINA, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Eduardo Munoz-Medina appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 22-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Munoz-Medina's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Munoz-Medina with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Munoz-Medina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 10, 2012
No. 11-10517 (9th Cir. Sep. 10, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Munoz-Medina

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EDUARDO MUNOZ-MEDINA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 10, 2012

Citations

No. 11-10517 (9th Cir. Sep. 10, 2012)