From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
No. CR-S-11-00349-GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-S-11-00349-GEB

10-06-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VICTOR ORLANDO MUNOZ, Defendant.

DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender DOUGLAS BEEVERS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant VICTOR ORLANDO MUNOZ BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Michele Beckwith Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

DOUGLAS BEEVERS, U.S.V.I. Bar #7 66

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

VICTOR ORLANDO MUNOZ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

Date: October 21, 2011

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties through their respective counsel, Michele Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Douglas Beevers, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant, VICTOR ORLANDO MUNOZ, that the Status Conference presently scheduled for October 7, 2011 be vacated, and rescheduled for Status Conference on October 21, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

This continuance is requested to allow the parties additional time to negotiate a fast-track plea toward resolution of the case once the PreSentence Investigative Report has been prepared and reviewed with Mr. Munoz.

To afford time to complete these tasks, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including October 21, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

DOUGLAS BEEVERS

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

VICTOR ORLANDO MUNOZ

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Michele Beckwith

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through October 21, 2011.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
No. CR-S-11-00349-GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Munoz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VICTOR ORLANDO MUNOZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

No. CR-S-11-00349-GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)