From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Oct 28, 2013
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:13-CR-5 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2013)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:13-CR-5

10-28-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONRAD LEIJA MUNOZ (2)


(Judge Crone)


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636. On October 7, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Dkt. #52) be DENIED.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Dkt. #52) is DENIED.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 28th day of October, 2013.

________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Oct 28, 2013
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:13-CR-5 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Munoz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONRAD LEIJA MUNOZ (2)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Oct 28, 2013

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:13-CR-5 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Whisman

When deciding whether "an officer [relied] on a warrant based on an affidavit so lacking in probable cause as…