From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Munchak

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 15, 1972
460 F.2d 1407 (2d Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 825, Docket 72-1388.

Argued June 13, 1972.

Decided June 15, 1972.

Edward N. Costikyan, New York City (Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Warren M. Green, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel J. Sullivan, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U.S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, John W. Nields, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Appeal from an order of Judge Weinfeld in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying appellant's motion for a new trial under F.R.Crim.P. 33 on the grounds of newly discovered evidence.

Before KAUFMAN, HAYS and OAKES, Circuit Judges.


The order denying appellant's motion for a new trial is affirmed on the basis of Judge Weinfeld's opinion below. 338 F.Supp. 1283 (S.D.N.Y. 1972).


Summaries of

United States v. Munchak

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 15, 1972
460 F.2d 1407 (2d Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Munchak

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. ANDREW MUNCHAK, JR., APPELLANT

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 1972

Citations

460 F.2d 1407 (2d Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. Marquez

To put the matter in proper focus, the Court instructed the jury: Cf. United States v. Munchak, 338 F. Supp.…

United States ex Rel. Regina v. Lavallee

A defendant may not obtain a new trial on the basis of evidence which he could have discovered by reasonable…