Summary
In United States v. Mulvey, 232 F. 513, where an order for naturalization was cancelled under § 15, on grounds which the Examiner of the Bureau of Naturalization had presented in opposition to the granting of naturalization, stress was laid upon the fact that the representative of the Bureau was not a law officer of the Government and that he appeared as amicus curiae; but in view of the language of § 11, the distinction does not seem of importance.
Summary of this case from United States v. NessOpinion
21-CR-36-A
04-08-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. KELSEY A. MULVEY, Defendant.
DECISION AND ORDER
This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On March 10, 2021, defendant Kelsey Mulvey appeared before Magistrate Judge Roemer and entered a plea of guilty to a one-count Information which charges her with tampering with a consumer product in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1365(a)(1) and (4).
Magistrate Judge Roemer issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 57) confirming his findings that defendant Mulvey's plea of guilty was knowing, voluntary, and supported by a factual basis. It is hereby
ORDERED that, upon review of the transcript of the March 10, 2021, change-of-plea proceeding before the Magistrate Judge, and the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that defendant Mulvey's plea of guilty was knowing, voluntary, and has a factual basis. Accordingly, defendant Mulvey's plea of guilty is accepted based upon the oral findings of the Magistrate Judge as confirmed in the written Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 57. A status conference regarding sentencing is scheduled for July 16, 2021 at 9:00 am.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/_________
HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: April 8, 2021