From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mulliken

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 16, 2003
83 F. App'x 243 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Submitted December 8, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding.

U.S. Attorney, USSE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Craig Nance, Law Office of Michael Nance, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Wendell Ray Mulliken appeals the judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 120-day prison sentence. We dismiss this appeal as moot because Mulliken has completed serving his entire sentence, and thus lacks standing to raise any challenge to it. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999) (citing Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998)).

Accordingly, the motion of Michael Nance, Esq. to withdraw as counsel of record is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mulliken

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 16, 2003
83 F. App'x 243 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

United States v. Mulliken

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Wendell Ray MULLIKEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 16, 2003

Citations

83 F. App'x 243 (9th Cir. 2003)